Scores and Comments

22.c.pr.170.765

Application Details
Proposal Type	Specific Cultural Project - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$25,000
Total Score	450.000
Average Score	75.000

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Baker Pasha	30	28	15	10	83
Beers Angela	37	27	18	7	89
Fraser Diane	20	20	18	7	65
Fromm Annette	30	20	10	3	63
Kancher Pam	31	18	15	6	70
Quinn Charlotte	32	24	16	8	80

Comments
Baker Pasha - Score: 83.000
{No comments provided.}
Beers Angela - Score: 89.000
{No comments provided.}
Fraser Diane - Score: 65.000
The application does not have much information. There's a large change in the personnel: administrative expenses that is not explained.
Fromm Annette - Score: 63.000
The proposal is to create a mini museum. No information is provided where the displays will be in the building. The proposal does not adequately address accessibility for disabled individuals. Budget - a huge expense for the administrative staff and operating expenses are projected with no explanation. In addition, the income is projected to increase with no explanation.
Kancher Pam - Score: 70.000
Question ability to complete entire project in stated 3 months. Limited partnerships. Support materials minimal. Don't fully understand the mini museum within the museum. Is there a larger museum already? Didn't describe the cultural services or actives that would be offered nor the economic impact of the program. Limited information about marketing Evaluation plan too vague Concern over anticipated admission revenue going from $2536 last year to $13000 as the proposed budget cash match. Did not provide credible support for increasing the budget 173% from last year to this current year.
Quinn Charlotte - Score: 80.000
{No comments provided.}